Articles Posted in Domestic Assault and Battery

| by

A stop for what police believed would be a routine drunk driving arrest resulted in a Lawrence man, Silver Dubon, being arrested on outstanding warrants for threats, assault and battery and attempted murder. Dubon was initially pulled over on route 110 in Lawrence and charged with speeding, failure to use care in stopping, a marked lanes violation, driving without a license and operating under the influence of alcohol. According to The Lawrence Eagle Tribune, after the police determined the identity of the driver, he faced additional charges. Reports indicate that the outstanding warrants relate to a case of alleged domestic violence dating back to 2008. Although all of the facts of the case are not known at this time, the Tribune reports that over one year ago Dubon allegedly had an argument with his wife that escalated into a physical fight.

In Massachusetts operating under the influence of alcohol and assault and battery are considered misdemeanor offenses. Assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon and attempted murder are felonies. A charge is a misdemeanor when the most that a defendant could be sentenced to is a committed sentence in jail or in the house of correction. If the potential penalty for a crime is committed time in state prison then the offense is considered a felony.

If you have been charged with a crime you should have an experienced Boston defense attorney on your side. If you are facing charges in Peabody, Lowell or Lawrence having a local defense lawyer on your side can make a big difference in the outcome of your case. In cases where a defendant is charged with “domestic violence” a 209 A civil restraining order is often sought by the complaining witness. Although the order itself is civil, a criminal charge may issue if there is an allegation of a violation of the order. Thus, preventing the issuance of the order by having an attorney present your side of the case is crucial.

Continue Reading

| by

Angel Mejia, a Lawrence Police Detective, was arrested and charged with assault and battery on his sixteen year old daughter. According to The Lawrence Eagle Tribune, Mejia had a confrontation with his teenage daughter when he caught her attempting to sneak into the house at 5:45 a.m.. It is alleged that Mejia pushed his daughter onto the pavement, where she struck her face and suffered bruises and scrapes. It has been reported that the Detective also pushed her against the garage door and the refrigerator. This type of case is often categorized as a case of Domestic Violence and taken very seriously by prosecutors and the court system. Due to the fact that Mejia routinely works with prosecutors in the Lawrence District Court the case has been specially assigned to an Essex County Assistant District Attorney usually assigned to the Peabody District Court. The Detective was released and ordered to abide by any conditions ordered by the Department of Children and Family Services. Mejia is currently scheduled to return to court on December 21, 2009. The Tribune did not indicate whether the sixteen year sought a 209A restraining order against her father.

Based on the facts in this case, the defendant is likely charged with three counts of assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon. If convicted for assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon in Massachusetts, a defendant can be sentenced to up to two and one half years in jail on each count or up to ten years in state prison on each count. Here, the “dangerous weapons” would be the pavement, garage door and refrigerator. An object may qualify as “dangerous weapon,” within the meaning of statute either because it is dangerous per se, as an instrumentality designed and constructed to produce death or great bodily harm, or because it is used in dangerous fashion. Although a refrigerator, pavement or garage door are not “dangerous per se”, if they are used in a “dangerous fashion” they may be considered a dangerous weapon in Massachusetts. Some examples of objects that have been found to be dangerous weapons in Massachusetts that would not ordinarily be one are: pavement, sneakers, rings and a lighted cigarettes.

Continue Reading

| by

The Lowell Sun reports that, a local teacher has been charged with assault by means of a dangerous weapon. The paper reports that the defendant allegedly intervened in a family fight between her husband and his brother who were in a heated argument. One of the individuals was reportedly holding his twenty two month old son at the time of the incident. The teacher plead not guilty in the Lowell District Court and was released on personal recognizance.

Although all of the facts are not known at this time, in these types of situations a defendant may have a viable claim of self defense or a claim of defense of another. In Massachusetts, a person is allowed to use reasonable force in self-defense when this is necessary to protect herself from physical harm. And therefore it is not a crime to strike at another person if this is done in reasonable self-defense. Similarly, an person can also use reasonable force to protect another from physical harm.
In Massachusetts, in addition to proving the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, the Commonwealth must also prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was not acting in self defense. In order to prevail the government must prove that one or more of the following three requirements are absent:

First: For the defendant to have acted in self-defense, she must have reasonably believed that she was being attacked or was immediately about to be attacked, and that her personal safety was in immediate danger; and
Second: For the defendant to have acted in self-defense, she must have done everything that was reasonable in the circumstances to avoid physical combat before resorting to force;
Third: For the defendant to have acted in self-defense, she must have used no more force than was reasonably necessary in the circumstances to defend herself.

When a case involves a fight between family members it is often categorized as a case of domestic violence. Often, the prosecutor and the police recommend that the alleged victim obtain a restraining order. If you have been served with a restraining order you should contact an attorney to try to prevent the extension of the order. Although a restraining order is a civil order, if the complainant reports a violation you can be charged with a criminal offense.

Continue Reading

| by

Twenty-three year old Fidel Sena, from Peabody Massachusetts, has been arrested and charged with assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon causing serious bodily injury on a fifty-three year old man. According to The Salem News, Salem police officers responded to a report relative to a fight involving the use of baseball bats. When the police arrived at the scene the fifty-three year old victim was lying on the ground. He was eventually transported to the Salem Hospital for treatment. A witness provided the police with a license plate number and description of the alleged perpetrator. According to reports, witnesses were brought to where the police pulled over the car and they identified Sena as the perpetrator.

In Massachusetts, in order for the Commonwealth to prove assault and battery it must prove that a defendant touched another person without consent. Assault and battery is considered a misdemeanor in Massachusetts because the maximum sentence is a commitment to jail or a house of correction and not state prison. However, the charge of assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon is a felony because the potential punishment is a commitment to state prison.

If you have been charged with a crime in Massachusetts, you must have an experienced defense attorney on your side. Although all of the facts of this case are not known at this time, filing a motion to suppress the identification of the defendant may be appropriate because it appears that the police brought the witnesses to the suspect for a one on one show up identification. In these types of case, pre-trial motions requesting the circumstances surrounding the identification of the defendant as the perpetrator should be filed to determine the viability of filing motion to suppress the identification of the defendant as the perpetrator.

Additionally, if you have been charged with domestic assault and battery a qualified defense attorney is important to ensure that all of your rights are protected. In the event that a complaining witness applies for a restraining order and you are notified of a hearing relative to the issuance or extension of a restraining order, you must have an experienced Boston area domestic violence attorney on your side. You must be informed of all of your rights and options to avoid making statements and giving testimony at a restraining order hearing that may be used against you at trial or be the grounds for additional charges issuing against you.

Continue Reading

| by

The Salem News reports that forty-eight year old Peter Postell from Salem Massachusetts will be spending the next six months in jail for shoving a neighbor that Postell had been ordered to stay away from. Postell was two weeks away from completing his probation for a harassment conviction. His terms of that probation included that he have no contact with neighbors who were the target of the harassment. Earlier this week in a hearing conducted in Salem District Curt the neighbor testified that as he tried to avoid making eye contact with PostellPostel as he came down the street but Postell came up and shoved him. According to reports, the defense suggested that the timing of the allegations were suspicious due to the fact that Postell was expected to move in next door to the complaining neighbors after the probationary term ended. A District Court Judge did not buy the argument and Postell was sentenced to six months in jail.

In Massachusetts, ordering a defendant to have no contact or to stay away from alleged victims or complainants is a common term of probation. Crimes in which this type of order is often imposed includes circumstance in which a defendant is charged with domestic assault and battery, assault and battery, trespass, violation of a restraining order, threats and harassment. If you have been charged with this type of offense it is imperative that you have an experienced Boston area defense attorney on your side. In the event that the case is disposed of you must ensure that any imposed term of probation is reasonable and related to the crime charged.

In the District Courts of Massachusetts defendants do not ordinarily go to jail because of the initial charge. It is often when the probation department alleges that a term of probation has been violated that the defendant’s liberty is in jeopardy. The probation department gives notice to the defendant that it believes he or she violated the terms of probation and a preliminary hearing is conducted. Depending on the facts of the case, the probation officer may request that a defendant be held in detention until the final surrender hearing. At the final surrender hearing the defendant has the opportunity to present his defense. The rules that apply during a probation hearing are more “relaxed” than those that apply at a trial. Although less stringent, any information must be credible and reliable. If you are facing a probation surrender hearing it is imperative that you have an experienced trial attorney at your side to ensure that your rights are protected and the probation department is made to sustain its burden of proof.

Continue Reading

| by

Thirty-two year old Lawrence Massachusetts man Jorge Guzman has been arrested and charged with assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon, assault and battery on a household member, mayhem, assault and battery on a child under fourteen, and malicious damage to property over $250. The Lawrence Eagle Tribune reports that Guzman threw kitchen furniture around and eventually threw boiling water at his twenty-eight year old girlfriend, Aura Vasquez, and her young toddler. According to reports, Vasquez informed police that Guzman had been drinking and became jealous. An argument ensued that, unfortunately, became physical. Vasquez and her child suffered second and third degree burns on thier faces and other areas of their bodies. Vasquez is being treated at Massachusetts General Hospital and her daughter is at the Shriner’s Hospital.

In Massachusetts, the defendant can be charged with assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon because the boiling water is the alleged “dangerous” weapon. The case law in Massachusetts defines a “dangerous weapon” as an object that is “per se” dangerous, such as a gun or an object that can that is used in dangerous fashion. For example, a pencil would not be considered a dangerous weapon “per se,” however, if it was used to poke or stab someone it would be considered a “dangerous weapon.” If convicted of this offense a defendant can face up to ten years in state prison or two and one half years in jail.

Although all of the facts are not known in this case, it appears that this case stems from an incident of alleged domestic violence. In such cases, the police often inform the complaining witness of his or her right to apply for an emergency restraining order. If you believe that you are the defendant in a restraining order you should contact an experienced Massachusetts criminal lawyer. In order for a restraining order to issue the complainant must demonstrate that he or she is in reasonable apprehension of immediate physical harm. You must have an aggressive advocate on your side. If you are a defendant in a criminal case and receive notice of a restraining order hearing contact Our Attorney. There are many issues that must be considered such as whether it is prudent for you to speak at the hearing. In most district courts, the restraining order hearings are recorded. Thus, if you speak anything that you say could be used against during the criminal proceeding. It is imperative that you contact a Massachusetts domestic violence attorney to ensure that you understand the consequences of any actions that you take.

Continue Reading

| by

Fifty-two year old Mariano Liriano of Lawrence Massachusetts was arrested and charged with indecent assault and battery on a person over fourteen years old. The Lawrence Eagle Tribune reported that a seventeen year old girl accused Liriano of putting his hand on her leg and moving it up. According to the Tribune, the pair knew one another. The woman told Liriano to stop and he gave her a ride home. When she returned home she called the police. Liriaano was arrested at his home and charged with indecent assault and battery on a person over fourteen.

In Massachusetts, the crime of indecent assault and battery is a felony. A conviction for this offense carries a sentence of up to two years in jail or five years in state prison. See, M.G.L.A. 265 § 13H.

In Massachusetts, there are two theories under which the government can prosecute a person for assault and battery. The most common one is the intentional touching of another person without consent. A second way in which a person may be found guilty of assault and battery us when, instead of engaging in intentional conduct, an individual engages in reckless conduct that results in physical injury.When the police respond to a call for a “domestic violence” the police generally place someone under arrest. If you find yourself in this situation you must contact an experienced domestic violence attorney to protect your rights and ensure that a civil restraining order does not issue requiring you stay away from your home, your children or your spouse. Although a restraining order is considered a civil order if you are charged with violating that order it is criminal offense.

Continue Reading

| by

The Salem News reports that a Salem Superior Court judge released Nicholas Pratt, 24 of Salem who is accused of shaking his infant son during a fight with the child’s mother on Mother’s Day. The prosecutor argued that Pratt was a danger and should remain behind bars however, Judge Timothy Feeley released him to live with his friend and employer.

According to reports, Pratt is charged with two counts of domestic assault and battery on his six month old son and his girlfriend. The baby was examined and found to have an injury to his eye. Apparently, there was an indication that the child suffered a previous skull fracture. Authorities do not know how or when that injury occurred. There is also an additional charge of intimidation of a witness. Depending on the facts of a case in which domestic assault and battery has been alleged, the charge of intimidation of a witness often stems from attempts that the defendant may have made to prevent the complainant from contacting the police.

Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 268 § 13B provides that witness intimidation requires proof that (1) an individual was a witness in a stage of a criminal proceeding, and that the defendant (2) wilfully endeavored or tried to influence the witness, (3) did so by means of intimidation, force, or threats of force, or the offering of inducements, and (4) did so with the specific intent of influencing the witness. In Massachusetts, the witness intimidation statute punishes anyone who willfully endeavors to intimidate a witness; it does not require that the intimidation be successful. An experienced Massachusetts defense attorney can challenge the prosecutor’s case by establishing that the government fell short on proving any one of these elements beyond a reasonable doubt.

When facing charges of domestic violence in Massachusetts it is imperative that a defendant be familiar with the rules that govern the issuance of a restraining order. In order to apply for a restraining order a complainant must demonstrate that he or she is in reasonable apprehension of immediate physical harm. When there is a request for a restraining order and a hearing is going to take place while a criminal case is pending, a defendant should seek the advice of an experienced Massachusetts domestic violence lawyer before speaking at any hearing. Under most circumstances, any statements made by a defendant during a restraining order hearing can be used against him or her at trial. The decision whether to speak during this hearing in an attempt to prevent the order from issuing but risking providing the District Attorney with potentially damaging evidence is an important one. Making the wrong decision may affect the outcome of your criminal case.

Continue Reading

| by

According to The Lowell Sun, a 34-year-old Lowell Massachusetts man, who was convicted for motor vehicle homicide and operating under the influence of alcohol causing serious bodily injury six years ago found his way back to prison after serving most of his 5 to 6 year committed sentence. The defendant was released from prison to a five year probationary term. However, this week a Superior Court Judge sitting in Lowell Massachusetts found that the defendant violated the terms of his probation after being arrested on charges of domestic assault and battery and malicious destruction of property in an incident involving his sister-in-law. According to reports, he was sentenced to serve the rest of his two-year jail sentence on his conviction for operating under the influence causing serious bodily injury.

If you have been served with a notice from the probation department that they are looking to surrender you because you violated the terms of your probation it is imperative that you contact an experienced Massachusetts trial attorney. The rules that apply during a probation surrender hearing are different from the rules that apply during a trial.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has held that “the due process clause does not place a per se prohibition on the use of hearsay evidence at probation revocation hearings.” Commonwealth v. Durling, 407 Mass. 108, 115 (1990). Rather, “[u]nsubstantiated and unreliable hearsay cannot, consistent with due process, be the entire basis of a probation revocation.” The court also considers whether the evidence at the hearing is entirely hearsay and whether there is good cause for not having direct testimony.

In Massachusetts, a probationer has only a conditional liberty interest. The probationer is expected to comply with the conditions of probation. A breach of a condition of probation constitutes a violation, and if the probation officer receives information tending to show that the probationer has breached, the officer may “surrender” the probationer to the court. During a trial, the government must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. However, the standard at a probation revocation hearing is lower. A probationer’s probation may be revoked based on the probation department establishing a violation by a preponderance of evidence. In Massachusetts, the Courts position is that a probation revocation hearing is not part of criminal prosecution and, thus, a probationer need not be provided with the full panoply of constitutional protections available at criminal trial. However, the Courts have held that the revocation of probation does result in a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and thus, the Commonwealth must provide probationers with certain protections at surrender hearings. In Massachusetts, the hearsay on which the judge relies must be reliable.

If you have received notice of a “probation violation” it is important that you contact an experienced Massachusetts trial attorney to represent you at the surrender hearing. Effective representation can result in the court not finding you in violation or if you are found in violation convince the judge not to impose the sanction recommended by the probation officer. In certain situations, the submission of a memorandum opposing the finding of a violation is appropriate.

Continue Reading

| by

According to The Lawrence Eagle Tribune, the police responded to Woodland Avenue in Salem Massachusetts on a report of a domestic dispute. According to the paper, Jake Wells, 32 years old called the police and reported that his father, John Wells, threatened him with a chain saw. When the police arrived they saw the elder Wells on the front porch holding a chain saw that was running. John Wells initially refused to drop the “weapon” however, eventually succumbed and was placed in custody. The paper also reports that the son went after the police and was also arrested. The elder is free on bail and junior will be summonsed to the District Court.

Based on these facts it appears that the John Wells will likely face charges of assault by means of a dangerous weapon, assault and battery on a police officer and resisting arrest. His son will likely face assault and battery on a police officer and resisting arrest. As in most cases where the police respond to a home on a report of “domestic violence,” it is also likely that the parties will be informed of their rights to apply for a restraining order.

The authority for the issuance of restraining orders is derived from M.G.L. ch. 209A §3. Not just anyone can apply to the District Court for a restraining order to issue. The parties must be a “family” or “household member” and the applicant must feel that he or she is abused. Family or household members are people who are or were married to one another, people who are or were residing in the same household, are or were related by blood or marriage, have a child together or who are or were in a substantive dating or engagement relationship. “Abuse” has been defined as attempting to cause or causing physical harm, placing another in fear of imminent serious physical harm and causing someone to engage in sexual relations involuntarily by force, threat or duress.

Continue Reading