Articles Posted in Domestic Assault and Battery

A Lawrence Massachusetts man was arrested last week and charged with two counts of assault and battery on a child under fourteen and assault and battery on a child under fourteen years old and assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon. According to The Lawrence Eagle Tribune, the police allege that Amaruys Guzman of Lawrence beat his nine year old son and his ten year old daughter with a phone charger chord.

According to reports, the police were called to a South Lawrence East School to investigate a child abuse complaint. Apparently, the two siblings fought over a toy car that the brother returned with from a local park and claimed that it was given to him by a friend. His sister told him that he had to return the toy. The children were struck with the wire cord after the stepmother called their father home to deal with the situation.

In Massachusetts, the charge of assault and battery is a misdemeanor and if convicted, a defendant can face up to two and one half years in jail. However, the crime of assault and battery upon a child that causes bodily injury is a felony and if convicted a defendant faces up to five years in state prison or up to two and one half years in jail. The crime of assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon is also a felony with the potential penalty of up to ten years in state prison or up to two and one half years in jail. These types of crimes are considered violent crimes against a person.

If you are charged with any type of assault and battery in Massachusetts, you must contact an experienced defense attorney as early as possible. Depending on the facts of the case, the defenses of self-defense and defense of another are often viable defenses. Also, depending on the circumstances, an experienced Massachusetts trial attorney can demonstrate that a defendant was improperly identified as the perpetrator. This is commonly referred to as a “case of mistaken identification.”

Continue Reading

According to The Salem News, Rafael Lugo, 21 years old from Salem Massachusetts has been charged with six counts of assault and battery and five counts of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon. A warrant for Lugo’s arrest issued after police said some students at Salem High School witnessed him repeatedly slam his girlfriend’s head into the steering wheel of a car as she held their 1-year-old daughter. Coincidentally, on the day of his arraignment for these charges, Lugo was also due in court for a pretrial hearing that related to a previous domestic abuse case involving the same parties. It has been reported that the teenage victim, a special needs student at the school, and her mother are both saying, “It’s not that big a deal,” according to Lugo’s attorney.

Despite the fact that the court did not issue a restraining order due to the fact that the victim claimed that she was not in fear of Lugo, the judge revoked his bail in the pending case and set additional bail of $5,000 on the new charges. Additionally, the Salem News reported that the police filed a report with the Department of Children and Families. Lugo’s next scheduled court date is May 11th.

As with all cases, there are two sides to every story. The News reported that Lugo’s attorney maintained that his client, who was previously slashed on the face at a nightclub said the incident on Wednesday was provoked by the woman biting him on the face, near where he was stabbed.

According to The Lawrence Eagle Tribune Ed Manzi, 47, of 125 Windkist Farm Road North Andover Massachusetts was arrested and charged with attempted murder, assault and battery, possession of a firearm, malicious destruction of property, intimidation of a witness and related offenses as a result of an incident with his girlfriend, Catherine Lambert. Manzi teaches in Tewksbury Massachusetts and has been suspended from his position without pay as a result of these charges.

Before the altercation the pair and their baby were at Ipswich River Park when Manzi drove off without them. Manzi’s attorney, Anthony Rozzi of Haverhill Massachusetts, maintained that Manzi left the park because Patricia was drinking alcohol in the park. According to the Tribune, when Lambert was packing Manzi’s clothes in a basket he punched her in the face and then struck her in the head with a computer speaker and monitor. She ran to get her mother, Patricia Lambert, who was outside riding a horse.

According to court documents, Patricia Lambert reported that when she asked Manzi to give her the baby he punched her in the face knocking her to the floor. When she stood up, Manzi allegedly took a semi-automatic pistol from her pocket and hit her on the head with it. While hitting her, a live round ejected from the gun. Lambert claims that Manzi hit her on the head and pulled the trigger numerous times. After the gun misfired, Manzi left the area and discarded the gun on Boston Street.

The defense paints a much different picture of the incident. Attorney Rozzi claims that the defendant acted in self-defense. Rozzi maintains that Manzi client was upset because Catherine Lambert was allegedly drinking alcohol at the park. According to the Tribune, Rozzi said there was some pushing and shoving at the couple’s apartment, but Catherine fell over their computer table and which caused her injuries.

Following the hearing the defendant was held without bail pending the outcome of a “dangerousness hearing” scheduled for March 23, 2009. During a dangerousness hearing the District Attorney’s Office is expected to present evidence that Manzi poses a threat to the community and should be held without bail until the case is resolved. Based on the facts of this case, it appears that the defendant will begin to mount its claim of self-defense.

When an individual is charged with assault and battery, assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon or any other violent offense, self-defense is often a viable claim. In Massachusetts, in order to receive a jury instruction on self-defense the facts must indicate that the defendant must have reasonably believed that he or she was immediately about to be attacked or that his or her personal safety was in immediate danger. The individual must also have done everything that would be considered reasonable to avoid physical combat before resorting to force and must use no more force that was reasonably necessary in the circumstance to defend himself or herself. If self-defense is properly asserted during the trial, the instruction will also indicate that the District Attorney must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in self-defense

Continue Reading

According to the Lawrence Eagle Tribune, a North Andover man was arrested and charged with attempted murder, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, assault and battery on a household member and illegal possession of a handgun. According to the paper, the defendant allegedly beat up his live in girlfriend then attempted to shoot her mother when she tried to protect her. It is also alleged that the defendant pointed a gun at the woman’s mother however, the gun did not fire. It was reported that the police found a loaded semi-automatic weapon within blocks of the incident.

The woman was treated at the Lawrence General Hospital, located in Lawrence Massachusetts, for injuries as a result of the beating. She obtained a restraining order from the police. The defendant was arrested on a fugitive from justice warrant in New Hampshire.

If you have been the defendant in a restraining order it is important that you know your rights. The complaining witness must demonstrate to the judge that he or she has reasonable apprehension of immediate physical harm. The fear or apprehension must be reasonable and also must be rimminent. Initially, a temporary restraining order usually issues. The defendant is supposed to be served with a copy of the order and generally there is a court hearing within one week. If the defendant does not appear and the complainant requests a continuance of the order, the order is routinely extended. The order can be extended for up to one year at a time. Upon expiration of the order the complainant can request that it be continued, however the defendant has a right to be present.

If an individual is the recipient of a restraining order in Massachusetts, it is important that he or she reads all of the conditions. For example, some of the orders simply order that the defendant not “abuse” the complainant. Other conditions may provide that the defendant “stay away” from the complainant and sometimes children.

Continue Reading

A two count felony complaint issued charging rhythm and blues singer Chris Brown with assault and criminal threats on a person referred to as “Robyn F.” “Robyn F.” is believed to be fellow singer and girlfriend Rihanna. According to news reports, Brown briefly appeared in a Los Angeles Court House and the arraignment was postponed until April 6, 2009. It has been reported that an affidavit has been filed indicating that Brown repeatedly puncehd “Robyn F.” and that during the altercation her mouth filled up with blood that spilled over into the car. Many sources reported that the physical altercation took place after Rihanna read a text message from a former girlfriend on Brown’s phone. Although Rihanna was not in court it was reported that she did not want a restraining order to issue that would prevent Brown from contacting her.

As a result of the incident Rihanna apparently received serious injuries including bruises to her face. Rumors have been circulating that the couple may have recently become married. In Massachusetts one spouse cannot be forced to testfiy against another spouse. This is commonly referred to as the marital privilege. The privilege belongs to the witness and not the defendant. Therefore, if the victim wants to testify he or she can waive the privilege and the Commonwealth can call him or her to testify at trial. Furthermore, even if a witness invokes the marital privilege if there is other evidence that the state can present during a trial the case can still go forward.

In Massachusetts, cases involving domestic violence often are prosecuted without the cooperation of the alleged victim. The prosecution may collect evidence from other sources. For example, if a search warrant was executed, evidence [such as bloody clothing or in some cases weapon(s)] may have been collected to support the government’s case. Also, the 911 tape may provide some evidence that the prosecution can use.

In Massachusetts, the use of the information on the 911 tape is not always admissible because the defendant has a right to confront witnesses. However, in certain situations the Massachusetts Courts have held that the state can use the tape. If you are facing criminal charges and the prosecution is attempting to use a 911 tape it is imperative that you contact an experience Massachusetts defense attorney to move to have the tape excluded from evidence. The exclusion of this evidence often destroys the Commonwealth’s case and results in an acquittal or a dismissal.

Continue Reading

According to The Lawrence Eagle Tribune, a twenty-eight year old Lawrence man is accused of repeatedly whipping his step daughter on her back with a belt. As a result of the beating, the young girl developed welts on her back that were observed by a teacher and the school nurse. According to the paper, the child reported to the police that the beating occurred because she told her stepfather that she took $100.00 from her mother’s wallet to buy a present for her teacher. The defendant was arrested and charged with assault and battery on a family member, assault and battery on a child under 14 causing bodily injury and assault and battery with a dangerous weapon. The defendant was arraigned in the Lawrence District Court and $1000.00 bail was set. Upon his release he is not to have contact with his stepdaugher.

The girl reported that she heard her mother tell her step father that he could have punished her in a different way. According to the paper, the girl stated that her mother treated her injuries with lotion. However, the mother told the authorities that she did not observe the injuries.

Continue Reading