Massachusetts Criminal Defense Attorney Blog

Angel Anaya of Fall River, Massachusetts and Jose Rivera of Lawrence, Massachusetts were arrested early Tuesday night following a brief encounter with the police. According to today's Lawrence Eagle Tribune, an auto theft strike force was working in Lawrence that day. They received a stolen car report for a Toyota. Shortly thereafter, a patrol officer spotted the car in a restaurant parking lot. This took place around 7:30 in the evening. The driver later identified as Anaya hit the officer and fled in the car. A chase ensued. Anaya hit another car as well as a police cruiser and along with his passenger, Rivera, they fled the scene on foot. Rivera was charged with Receiving a Stolen Motor Vehicle, Unauthorized Use of a Motor Vehicle and Resisting Arrest. Anaya was charged with Assault With a Dangerous Weapon, Assault and Battery by Means of a Dangerous Weapon and Failing to Stop for a Police Officer. The cases are being prosecuted in the Lawrence District Court however these matters could be indicted and prosecuted in the Essex County Superior Court in Salem.

Read Article:

Massachusetts Motor Vehicle Crime Lawyer

Receiving Stolen Motor Vehicle in Massachusetts is a felony pursuant to M.G.L. c. 266 Section 28. The law states that anyone in possession of a stolen car, knowing the same to be stolen is guilty of that offense. The statute permits a sentence of up to fifteen years in state prison or two and one half years on the house of correction. A judge cannot continue a case like this without a finding. Anyone who gets convicted of a second or subsequent offense must serve a minimum mandatory one year jail sentence. Prosecutions for this crime cannot survive attack if it is determined that the district attorney did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had possession of the car, knew that the car was stolen and that he intended to deprive the owner of the car permanently.

In this regard, the district attorney in this case might have trouble proving this crime against Rivera. There is no indication that Rivera knew that the car was stolen. Things that might suggest otherwise are a popped ignition, simultaneous engagement in other illicit activity, particularly Theft Crimes, visible signs of ownership by another or the presence of other stolen motor vehicles. None of this appears present in this case. As a Massachusetts Criminal Lawyer I have had many cases where the charge of Receiving Stolen Motor Vehicle has been dismissed due to an absence of evidence to attribute knowledge to my client. These cases are often difficult for the district attorney to prove, particularly as to passengers. Nor for that matter should evidence of Rivera's flight be compelling. Anaya's actions might well have surprised and scared him. Being present in a car responsible for striking a police officer, getting into a chase and an accident could understandably give people reason to flee. While that action was probably not the best course of action for Rivera it is not a determinant of guilt.

Continue reading "Criminal Charges Filed in Lawrence Massachusetts for Larceny of a Motor Vehicle After Chase, Accident" »

Celina Garcia is an insurance claims adjuster. She works for Liberty Mutual. The thirty-four you old Lawrence, Massachusetts resident is now in some trouble. The Lawrence Eagle Tribune reports that about six months ago Garcia could not get her car started. She had it towed to a shot in New Hampshire and was told that the car had a bad timing belt. Garcia left the car with the mechanic. About two months later the mechanic called Garcia to see what she wanted to do with the car. She told him that she reported the car stolen. The mechanic then called the police. In all, Garcia collected over seven thousand dollars from the insurance company as a result of her false reports. She has been charged with various crimes in the Lawrence District Court; specifically, Larceny Over $250, Insurance Fraud and Filing a False Police Report.

Read Article:

Massachusetts Fraud Defense Law Firm

Larceny Over $250 in Massachusetts is a felony. The crime is set out in Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 266 Section 30. A conviction for this offense carries a possible five year state prison sentence. More likely than not Garcia has no criminal record so it would not surprise me to see this case remain in the district court. There, the maximum sentence a judge can impose is one year in the county jail. I would imagine that Garcia will receive no more than a continuance without a finding with an order of restitution to the insurance company.

The crime of Larceny in Massachusetts is defined as the unlawful taking and carrying away of personal property of another with specific intent to deprive person of property permanently. The property in this case is that of the insurance company. If the reported facts are true and comprehensive then Garcia's defenses are limited. However, here is what catches my eyes. Garcia is in the insurance business. She is a claims adjuster. She knows how insurance claims are investigated and defended. She, more than anybody would know the pitfalls and dangers of engaging in this type of criminal activity. She would also be cognizant of just how easy it is to get caught committing this type of crime, particularly if it was done as suggested by this article. Moreover, why would she admit to the mechanic that she was filing a false insurance claim. It makes no sense. There is no indication that Garcia knew this man. So why would she trust him with her confession to having committed a felony? How would this benefit her? What would she have to gain by telling this to someone? As is the case in any criminal matter the facts need to be examined more closely, something I am sure that Garcia's Massachusetts Criminal Lawyer will do.

Continue reading "Lawrence Massachusetts Woman Charged With Insurance Fraud, Filing a False Police Report, Larceny Over $250" »

According to a report in the Quincy Patriot Ledger Nicholas Chase of Rockland, Massachusetts went into a local Game Stop. Around noon last Friday Chase proceeded to convince the store employees that he intended to purchase a PlayStation3. He then asked the employee to get him something from another part of the store. When the employee complied with the request Chase took off with the video game machine. Oops! He forgot his phone. So what did he do? After a few hours passed Chase asked passers-by to go into the store to get his phone for him. Some of these people actually asked the store employees about the phone. The police were contacted. They eventually located Chase in his car in the parking lot. Oh, by the way, Chase's phone had his pictures in it. He is being charged in the Hingham District Court with Larceny Over $250 and with several Motor Vehicle Crimes.

Read Article:

Hingham Massachusetts Criminal Defense Attorney

By any account it appears that Chase will have some problems defending this case. First, the store employees are witnesses and can likely make an identification. Second, Chase's cell phone, left at the crime scene with his photos in it make his defense more difficult. Third, the identifications that can by made by the people in the parking lot will likely hurt his defense significantly. Lastly, his return to the scene of the crime where he was apprehended is tough to overcome. So what happens in a case like this? If Chase has no criminal record then his lawyer might have a shot at getting this case continued without a finding. Of course the Massachusetts Motor Vehicle Offenses might have to be packaged with the Larceny Over $250 case. If Chase has a criminal record then a continuance without a finding (CWOF) will be more difficult to obtain. There are likely many options available to Chase for disposition of this case.

If you ever want to read about stupid crimes go to the website www.clumsycrooks.com. What Chase is accused of doing pales in comparison to the things that people get caught doing every day. Just take a look at the first two articles posted on that website today: "Two men called police looking for help after two men stole their drugs and money late Saturday night, police said." and "Police in Michigan said a 9-year-old girl who was pulled over while driving for her drunken dad told officers she had been 'driving good.'". This website puts out stupid criminal stories every day. The stories are true. At times they are mind boggling. At times the defendants are Massachusetts residents and/or people being prosecuted in the Massachusetts courts.

Continue reading "Massachusetts Man Charged In Hingham Court For Larceny Over $250 After Returning To Crime Scene To Retrieve His Lost Cell Phone" »

This past Friday evening Salem, Massachusetts police officers saw what looked to them like a drug transaction. The suspect, Aquiles Sanchez took off in his car leading officers on a chase. He then fled on foot. However, sixty two year old John Carr saw the cruiser lights and knew something was wrong. He saw Sanchez walking through a neighbors' yard. Carr told him to stop. He did not. Instead he took off running. Carr chased Sanchez and tackled him. Carr's son and other neighbors helped out. Eventually the police arrived and made an arrest. Sanchez is being charged with Trafficking Oxycodone, Operating to Endanger and Resisting Arrest. The case will be prosecuted in the Essex County Superior Court.

Read Article:

http://www.salemnews.com/local/x7462022/Salem-man-helps-police-by-tackling-drug-suspect

Essex County Drug Trafficking Defense Lawyer

As a Massachusetts Drug Crimes Defense Lawyer I am interested in knowing exactly what observations the police made that led them to charge Sanchez with Trafficking Oxycodone. Usually, officers see only "what they believe to be a drug transaction". Their reports talk about the suspect's "furtive movements" or an "exchange" they believe constituted drug distribution. Rarely are binoculars or cameras used to capture the exchange. Also, the suspected "purchaser" is needed to help prove the crime. This person usually engages a lawyer and cooperation for the purchaser is rarely used since he or she is likely to be charged with possession of the controlled substance only. Large scale drug dealers rarely conduct their business in public so the fact that Sanchez was found in possession of ten thousand dollars is not in this case likely to be supportive of this allegation. I am interested in knowing how much of the drugs were found on the purchaser and if this quantity had a value near the amount of money Sanchez was carrying. If these factors do not add up then the trafficking case might be defensible.

Continue reading "62 Year Old Salem Man Tackles Drug Trafficking Suspect, Detains Him Until Police Arrive" »

Late last week a Massachusetts State Police Officer was on patrol on Route 138 in Raynham. At around 1:00 p.m. he observed a car following a pick up truck too closely, a violation of 720 Code of Massachusetts Regulation (CMR) 9.06(7). The trooper stopped the car and immediately smelled marijuana. He then saw a plastic bag containing marijuana in the center console. The passenger, Alexander Torres, eighteen from Brockton was asked what was in the bag. Torres responded that the drugs were his. There were five passengers in the car. One of them appeared to be shaking. All of them were ordered out of the car. The car was searched. The officer found several more bags of marijuana. Underneath the passenger seat the trooper found a loaded firearm. Torres accepted responsibility for the gun as well. The driver was cited for the Motor Vehicle Violation. Torres has been charged with Possession of a Firearm and Possession of Marijuana.

Read Article:

http://www.enterprisenews.com/news/cops_and_courts/x1073915927/Brockton-man-arrested-on-gun-drug-charges-after-traffic-stop#axzz1FvJHyFQc

In the past I have commented that Possession of Marijuana in Massachusetts is not a crime if the amount possessed is less than an ounce. It follows that stopping a car and finding marijuana in the car does not automatically give law enforcement the right to conduct a Search of the car. The constitutional protections associated with Searches and Seizures in my opinion strengthen in these situations. In the past in certain instances the police would have been warranted to search when they observed marijuana in plain view after making a lawful motor vehicle stop. That all changed with the decriminalization of small quantities of marijuana. There must now be more to justify a search after making such a cursory observation. The article does not convince me that this search was permissible. Torres might have a shot at suppressing the evidence seized if his Massachusetts Criminal Drug Crimes Defense Lawyer can argue an Unlawful Search and Seizure occurred.

Continue reading "Routine Traffic Stop Results In Gun, Drug Charges For Brockton Man, 18" »

Massachusetts Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(a)(2) allows a defendant who has been summonsed for arraignment and who has retained a lawyer to be excused from appearing at his or her arraignment. To avail oneself of this rule the attorney must enter an appearance prior to the return date and state in that appearance that this matter has been discussed with the defendant and that the case be scheduled for pretrial or some other proceeding. The rule applies to misdemeanors and felonies alike. There is a proposal pending that would eliminate the process altogether and require the presence of all defendants at arraignment.

Proponents of the amendment to the rule state that a defendant's absence from arraignment creates certain safety concerns. For example, a defendant cannot receive a bail revocation warning or an order to stay away from a victim. Nor for that matter would the defendant be present for the setting of conditions of bail. Advocates of the "new rule" ignore some critical points. The current version of the rule works. It contemplates the attorney telling his client when to return to court. Consistent with this obligation the judge at arraignment could simply order the attorney to advise the defendant of any bail conditions, stay orders or bail revocation warnings should any of these circumstances present themselves.

As a Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer who represents countless people living out of state I find the Rule 7(a)(2) necessary. We get calls from clients summonsed for Assault and Battery Cases, Motor Vehicle Crimes, Drug Crimes and more who are often unable to get to court on short notice for an arraignment. Many of these clients were unaware that criminal process was going to issue particularly in instances where the police were not involved. Rule 7(a)(2) enables us to go into court for our clients, have them arraigned in absentia and schedule a date convenient for a resolution of their case. This also gives us time to educate the district attorney about the nature of the allegations and negotiate a resolution with minimal court appearances.

Continue reading "How Much Longer Will Rule Of Criminal Procedure 7(a)(2) Last In Massachusetts" »

Braintree, Massachusetts police learned that a 2004 Honda that had been stolen might be in their town. A Braintree police sergeant spotted the car leaving an apartment building parking lot. The car was stopped and the driver identified as Mary Ajede of Lynn, Massachusetts was arrested. She has been charged with Unlicensed Operation of a Motor Vehicle and Receiving a Stolen Motor Vehicle. The charges are pending in the Quincy District Court.

Read Article:

http://www.patriotledger.com/news/cops_and_courts/x198684717/Lynn-woman-charged-with-driving-stolen-car

Quincy Car Theft Defense Lawyer

To convict someone of Receiving a Stolen Motor Vehicle the district attorney must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knew that the car was stolen. Sometimes proof of knowledge is easy. For example, if the ignition was punched you can assume the defendant knew that the car was stolen. If the defendant goes through illicit channels to "purchase" the car you might be able to infer knowledge. However, if there was no damage to the car and no other evidence that the defendant knew that the vehicle had in fact been stolen the prosecution might have a tough time securing a conviction. Our office has represented several people accused of this crime who realistically and legitimately believed that the car they were driving belonged to the person who permitted them to use the car. These people have been acquitted of these charges.

Continue reading "Lynn Woman Found Driving Stolen Car In Braintree Faces Receiving Stolen Motor Vehicle Charge" »

Craig Snow of Lynn, Massachusetts has been charged with violating the Massachusetts Social Host Law. The law states that anyone who sells or provides alcohol to minors or permits them to consume alcohol on your property can be charged with a crime in Massachusetts. The act occurred on March 21, 2010. A young woman was killed when a car being driven by her boyfriend drove through an intersection and crashed. The woman was ejected through the car's sunroof. The driver, Christopher Maxson was charged with Motor Vehicle Homicide. According to reports, Snow admitted to hosting the party and claimed that the guests brought their own alcohol to is parents' home.

Read Article:

Massachusetts Man Faces Charges Stemming From Motor Vehicle Homicide

Massachusetts Criminal Lawyers Who Defend People Accused Of Violating The Social Host Laws

The Massachusetts Social Host Law is set out in M.G.L. ch. 138 Section 34. A conviction of this law means you are guilty of a misdemeanor. There is a maximum sentence of one year in the house of correction. The law states that you can be held criminally responsible for allowing someone under the age of twenty one to consume alcohol on your property. Under Massachusetts the Social Host can be an adult or a juvenile. These charges are becoming more prevalent in Massachusetts. Essex County seems to be taking the lead on these matters. The charges are serious and require the services of an Experienced Massachusetts Criminal Defense Attorney.

Continue reading "19 Year Old Lynn Teen Charged With Violating Social Host Law, Contributing To Motor Vehicle Homicide" »

Jamald Harrold is facing charges in the Essex County Superior Court in Salem, Massachusetts for Assault With a Dangerous Weapon, Trafficking Cocaine, Receiving a Stolen Motor Vehicle and a School Zone Violation. The case stems from a December 22, 2009 incident where Harrold got into a confrontation with his former girlfriend's brother. It is alleged that Harrold pulled a knife on the man who in turn armed himself with a baseball bat. Police were called. When they arrived they observed the defendant in a motor vehicle that had been reported stolen a few days earlier. Inside the car the police found over twenty eight grams of cocaine.

Read Article:

Lynn, Massachusetts Man Looking At 7 Years Mandatory For Dealing Cocaine

Trafficking Cocaine in Massachusetts

The sentence for Cocaine Trafficking in Massachusetts rests primarily on the quantity of the substance that was sold or intended for sale. Over 28 grams mandates a five year state prison sentence. Add another two years to that conviction due to the school zone violation. The defenses to this case likely involve the ability of the prosecution to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that Harrold knew that the drugs were in the car. Keep in mind that Harrold was charged with Receiving a Stolen Motor Vehicle, not Larceny of a Motor Vehicle. Implicit in this is the fact that he did not steal the car. It is also conceivable that whoever he borrowed the car from took never let him know that the car was stolen. Similarly, it is not inconceivable that that person was responsible for the drugs in the car, not Harrold.

Continue reading "Lynn Man Charged With Trafficking Cocaine, Receiving Stolen Motor Vehicle Held On Bail" »

Lyn Toscano of Haverhill, Massachusetts is the assistant manager of the Registry of Motor Vehicles for the branch located in Haverhill. Earlier today Toscano was arraigned in the Haverhill District Court and charged with two counts of Soliciting a Bribe as a Public Employee, Conspiracy and Falsification of a Driver's License. It is alleged that the scheme in which she was involved started in September of 2008 and lasted until May of 2009. Authorities claim that Toscano was selling licenses to people who had not taken the driver's test. Police were tipped off by Richard Chase who ironically has been charged with Criminal Harassment of Toscano.

Read Article:

Massachusetts Registry Worker Charged With Selling Driver's Licenses

Falsification of a Driver's License in Massachusetts

This crime is a felony in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 90 Section 24B. The case can be prosecuted in either the District Court or the Superior Court and it carries with it a possible five year state prison sentence. If Toscano decides to Hire an Experienced Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer who understands Motor Vehicle Crimes she might be able to walk away from these charges without a criminal record.

Soliciting a Bribe as a Public Employee

This crime is proscribed by Massachusetts General Law Chapter 268A Section 2 and is also a felony in Massachusetts. A conviction of this crime is punishable by up to three years in state prison. This charge can also be continued without a finding so it is advisable that Toscano get a good lawyer right away.

Continue reading "Haverhill Registry Worker Charged With Falsifying Driver's Licenses, Conspiracy" »

Adolfo Bonilla and Josue Ramirez-Gonzalez both from Waltham, Massachusetts had been banned from a local bar. They tried to gain entry and when they were denied both threatened to return with a gun and shoot and beat the owner. The police were immediately called. When they arrived Bonilla allegedly drove the car directly at the responding police car. The car stopped. Both suspects got out of the car and tried to flee and ended up struggling with the police. Ramirez-Gonzalez was charged with Malicious Destruction to Property for throwing a rock at a parked car as well as resisting arrest. Bonilla was charged with Resisting Arrest, various Motor Vehicle Crimes, Threatening to Commit a Crime and Assault with a Dangerous Weapon. The case is being prosecuted in the Waltham District Court.

Read Article:

Waltham, Massachusetts Men Kicked Out Of Bar Threaten Owner, Get Arrested For Several Criminal Charges

Threatening to commit a crime is a violation of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 275 Section 2. The law makes clear that a conviction for the offense has a maximum sentence of six months in jail and a one hundred dollar fine. The irony in this case is that the bar owner was most probably scared by the threats yet this is the least of the defendant's problems. The malicious destruction to property charge is more serious particularly if the value of the property is two hundred fifty dollars or more. In that case the crime is a felony.

Continue reading "Two Men In Waltham Massachusetts Face Criminal Charges After Threatening To Return To Bar With Guns" »

After a Clerk's Hearing in the Newburyport District Court Alan T. Pearsall, of West Newbury, Massachusetts was charged with Motor Vehicle Homicide. On June 25, 2009 Pearsall was involved in an accident with a motorcycle that ended in the death of Haverhill, Massachusetts couple Earl and Maryella Morris. It was reported that Pearsall crossed over the center of the street to avoid a bicyclist. In doing so he entered lane in which the Morris' were traveling. A police accident reconstructionist formed the opinion that Pearsall was attempting to get back into his lane of travel and that the Morris' tried to avoid the collision by putting the motorcycle on its left side. Apparently Morris denied being at fault when interviewed by police at the scene. Morris was surprised when police accused him of being in the wrong lane of traffic at the time of the crash. He is being charged with Motor Vehicle Homicide in the Newburyport District Court.

Read Article:

Motor Vehicle Homicide Charges Issued Against Massachusetts Man Involved In Fatal Collision

The standard for issuing Criminal Complaints in Massachusetts is low and Pearsall should not be surpised that he must now defend against serious criminal charges. The standard that the prosecution must show is that there is probable cause to believe that a crime was committed and that the defendant was the person who committed the crime. Clerk Magistrates will often lean towards issuing the complaints particularly in cases like this one where death or serious bodily injury resulted. So now Pearsall has to defend against these charges. How is he going to do this? Without hesitation I would recommend engaging a private accident reconstructionist to determine how the crash occurred. The article seems to suggest that this accident was entirely Pearsall's fault. There is however no reference to the speed of the vehicles involved. Nor is there any explanation as to why the victims veered left as opposed to right, the seemingly more natural direction to take in an effort to avoid the crash. What if anything did any independent witnesses observe either during or just before the crash? What happened after the crash that might have resulted in Pearsall's car coming to rest in the position in which it was found? There are hundreds of questions like these that our accident reconstructionists explore when assisting our office in the preparation of defenses in cases such as this one.

Continue reading "Massachusetts Man To Face Criminal Charges For Motor Vehicle Homicide In Newburyport" »

This past Monday night Malden, Massachusetts police stopped a car that had been reported stolen in Brockton. After removing a passenger from the car the driver struck two police officers with his vehicle and pinned another officer against a parked vehicle. Two suspects, James Calo of Malden and Mark Dwyer of Framingham were arrested. A third suspect, Alexander Nesom was shot and killed by police officers. Dwyer initially evaded apprehension but was caught less than twelve hours later. When the police were able to stop the vehicle they found four bags of heroin on Calo. Charges of receiving motor vehicle and possession with the intent to distribute heroin are pending in the Malden District Court.

Read Article:

Shooting Suspects Arrested And Arraigned In Malden District Court

One charge not mentioned in the article that I would think would issue is assault with the intent to murder. If the driver of the car deliberately drove into the three police officers he hit he can be charged with this crime. Assault with the intent to murder is a crime pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 265 Section 18. This crime is a felony and is punishable by up to twenty years on state prison. This crime must be prosecuted in the Superior Court. To prove armed assault with the intent to murder the government must proved beyond a reasonable that the defendants 1) committed an assault; 2) having a specific intent to kill the victim; and 3) that they did so acting with malice, which is defined as an absence of justification or mitigation. In cases such as this one the driver defends these charges by presenting evidence that he never intended to strike the officers with the vehicle, rather that he was trying to make his escape. The passenger's defense will embrace his lack of knowledge as to the actions that driver ultimately took.

Continue reading "Seemingly Routine Motor Vehicle Stop In Malden Massachusetts Results In Officers Getting Injured, Shots Fired And Drug Charges Filed" »

Last Friday Salem, Massachusetts police received a tip that a certain car was carrying a large amount of cocaine. Police spent the day looking for the car. They eventually found it operating on Washington Street. Officers followed the car and "waited for the driver to commit a traffic violation". According to the Salem News, the driver, Angel F. Merced Virella, 37, of Salem did just that. He failed to use a signal when turning and he was stopped. Virella did not have a license. He was arrested and charged with operating without a license. The police noticed an excessive amount of air freshener in the car suggesting to them that Virella was trying to conceal a particular odor. The car was towed and a search warrant was obtained. Then came the search of his car which revealed over five hundred grams of a highly pure cocaine in a concealed compartment. Virella has been charged with trafficking over two hundred grams of cocaine.

Read Article:

Essex County Massachusetts Man Facing Major Cocaine Trafficking Charge

Reading this article several thoughts come to mind. The legality of the stop will no doubt be challenged by Virella's lawyer. What made the police so certain that by following him around he would commit a motor vehicle violation warranting a stop. Exactly what information did the police have when they were looking for that vehicle? Obviously the information came from an informant but how reliable was that person? What prior dealings, if any did the police have with this individual? Did the car belong to Virella or someone else? Were Virella's fingerprints on the drugs? Many of these questions will be answered when the district attorney surrenders police reports and related materials to the defense. Virella's attorney will probably file a motion to suppress the stop and seizure of the vehicle. If this is successful the case will probably be dismissed.

Continue reading "Salem Massachusetts Man Arrested And Charged With Trafficking Cocaine" »

Christopher Hayes must have thought that he would be inconspicuous shooting up heroin near a convenience store on Lowell Street in Andover, Massachusetts. He was wrong. Police detectives in the area saw Hayes sitting in a 1993 Oldsmobile. They approached the car to see what he was doing. There, in plain view and at 1:00 in the afternoon officers saw Hayes injecting himself with heroin. When he realized who they were Hayes took off. Authorities claim that in the process he tried to run over three detectives. Hayes took off. He then threw the heroin and some drug paraphernalia out of the car. Officers recovered the evidence. Hayes was ultimately apprehended and charged with possession of heroin, possession of drug paraphernalia, assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon and assault with the intent to murder. Charges are now pending in the Lawrence District Court. Bail has been set at two thousand five hundred dollars.

Read Article:

Motor Vehicle Charges, Drug Charges For Massachusetts Man Who Assaulted Police Officers

All of these charges can be prosecuted in the District Court. If the cases are kept there the maximum sentence that can be imposed is two and one half years in the house of correction for the crimes of violence, two and one half years for the drug paraphernalia and two years for possession of heroin. These sentences can be imposed consecutively if a judge deems that to be appropriate. The length of the sentence depends on the defendant's criminal record and the severity of the crime. Factors such as age, level of education and drug dependency often serve as factors that mitigate the severity of the sentence that will be imposed.

Continue reading "Man Caught Using Heroin In Andover Massachusetts Tries To Run Down Detectives" »